← All postsMarkets

The bridge from emerging-market wallets to US capital markets is being built right now

For a decade, adding US equities to a Lagos or São Paulo or Riyadh fintech meant a 9-month, $300K integration. In 2026 it's six weeks at zero starting cost. The math just flipped, and most founders haven't priced it in.

Flo Team
Flo Finance
7 min read
The bridge from emerging-market wallets to US capital markets is being built right now

A founder in Lagos asked me last month what this would actually look like for him. He runs a wallet with about 1.2 million monthly active users, and he'd just been quoted a nine-month, $400K integration to add US stocks. He wanted to know whether the math had changed. We talked for forty minutes. By the end I think I'd convinced him to take the meeting again in six weeks instead of nine months.

Most of what gets written about tokenized stocks in 2026 is written from inside the US. The framing tends to be: how do US-domiciled crypto users get on-chain exposure to the S&P 500. That's a real question. It's not the question that decides whether this category becomes a $1 billion business or a $1 trillion one.

The question that decides that is whether a fintech in Lagos, São Paulo, Riyadh, Jakarta, or Mumbai can give its users US equity exposure through one SDK call.

I spent the last three years selling capital-markets infrastructure to emerging-market fintechs, and the pattern was always the same. Every founder I talked to eventually asked some version of the same question. How do I add US stocks for my users without becoming a brokerage.

The honest answer for a long time was that you couldn't, not really. You could integrate Alpaca's Broker API if you committed nine months and three engineers and absorbed a $250K to $500K annual minimum. You could integrate DriveWealth or Apex Clearing through a similar contract. None of those answers fit a fintech with a million users in MENA spending six figures of engineering budget on roadmap, not infrastructure.

That was 2024. I don't think it's the answer anymore.

What changed

Three things converged in the last twelve months, and any one of them on its own wouldn't have flipped the math. Together they did.

The broker-dealer infrastructure for tokenized US equities matured. Alpaca's Instant Tokenization Network, Dinari's SEC-registered broker-dealer subsidiary, Ondo Global Markets' multi-chain distribution. All in production, all handling real volume. The picks and shovels are real now in a way they weren't even a year ago.

The regulatory perimeter narrowed. The GENIUS Act of July 2025 codified stablecoin treatment for the first time. The Clarity Act, expected in 2026, will narrow the perimeter on tokenized securities. Both reduce the cost of building infrastructure for non-US users, because they reduce the surface area of "what counts as a security and who can offer it" that infrastructure vendors have to defend on their own.

And the demand from emerging-market fintechs hit critical mass. Not because tokenized stocks are exciting in a novel-financial-instrument sense. They aren't. The reason is that the alternative, building a US broker-dealer integration in-house, became less defensible as the integration-layer alternatives improved.

What it actually looks like

Imagine you ship US equity exposure to your users in six weeks, with one SDK integration, no broker-dealer license to negotiate, no $400K annual contract. Every primitive (mint, redeem, supply, withdraw, borrow, repay) is asynchronous via an on-chain order_id. The SDK call submits one on-chain tx that atomically pulls or burns the user's assets and creates an order on chain; the terminal action (live token mint, stablecoin payout, lending-vault share mint, loan disbursement) lands via settle(order_id) once the broker leg confirms on the broker-dealer cycle (T+1 for US equities, T+2 elsewhere). The broker leg is what it is, and any vendor telling you otherwise is selling you something. The user has an immediate, observable on-chain claim from the moment the create-order tx confirms — that's the architectural improvement, not a fictional pre-broker fast path. Your engineering team writes one integration, not three.

What you give up: you're not a broker-dealer. You're a fintech that resells tokenized US equity exposure through an infrastructure provider. For 95% of fintechs in 95% of jurisdictions, I think that's the right trade.

What you keep: the user relationship, the brand, the UX, the wallet, the cross-sell into other products. The infrastructure provider stays invisible. You capture the customer-relationship economics, which is the part that compounds.

This is what makes "Simple SDK for tokenized stocks" not a marketing line but a real description of the architectural shift.

The thing nobody is pricing in

There's one part of the category I think is underappreciated. Almost the entire ecosystem clears through a single broker. Alpaca self-reports ~94% market share of tokenized US equities AUC (December 2025). Ondo, Dinari, Backed, and most newer entrants all route through Alpaca for clearing.

For a US-based fintech, that's a manageable concentration. For a fintech serving 1.2 million users in MENA where a single broker-side outage knocks out their core product for hours, it's existential.

Flo runs two prime brokers from day one. Interactive Brokers and Alpaca. Not because broker redundancy is a fashionable feature, but because every emerging-market founder I sold to in the last three years told me the same thing. Single-vendor risk on infrastructure layers was the reason they'd been reluctant to commit. They had all seen what happens when a payments processor or a BaaS provider has a multi-day outage. They were not going to repeat that pattern with US equities.

The honest framing

We're not at the production scale of Alpaca or Ondo. We don't have an SEC-registered broker-dealer subsidiary, so the regulatory positioning sits downstream of our broker partners, which I think is the right place for it. What we are is a focused infrastructure team building the integration layer that emerging-market fintechs need: two brokers, public and private markets through one SDK on the roadmap, and a settlement-claims framework that explains where liquidity-backed settlement applies and where the broker cycle takes over. Mint, redeem, sandbox, and webhooks are free to integrate, with no setup fee, no monthly minimum, and no annual contract. Partners set their own retail price on top and keep every spread.

I might be drawing some of these lines wrong. The category is moving fast and the answer that's right today may not be right in twelve months. But if you're a fintech founder reading this and you concluded a year ago that US equities was off the table for your market, the math has changed. The integration is six weeks. The conversation with me is thirty minutes.

Written by Flo Team, Flo Finance
More posts →